Comments on: Web 2.0 Summary

By: Dysfonction erectile

Dysfonction erectile — Sat, 21 Aug 2010 13:44:55 +0000

I think that web 2.0 mainly is a Facebook. Before web 2.0 people do not know what is it- internet and how to use it. Now 90% people using internet to take part in social networks.

By: Chiriqui Panama

Chiriqui Panama — Wed, 12 May 2010 05:41:33 +0000

I recently came accross your website and have been reading along. I thought I would leave my very first remark. Nice blog. I will keep visiting this website very frequently.

By: g.jenkins

g.jenkins — Tue, 01 Dec 2009 21:17:51 +0000

Yes – I think a lot of people are looking at web 2.0 to shape business practice as well as application design/delivery. We’re finding wikis a wonderful fit for collaborative document/procedure design. They seem to fit the bill better than any workflow/document management solution we’ve found so far. Value-for-money definitely plays a part but I think that the inherent agility of web 2.0 style tools.

By: Sam Denniss

Sam Denniss — Tue, 01 Dec 2009 11:59:46 +0000

Some of the same issues arose in the Collaboration Tools BoaF session at the conference and I wonder what we make as the distinction between these. Our TULIP portal that supports cross business processes looks rather dated now with its basic web interface, so we have been looking at new technologies to give it that web 2.0 look and feel. A combination of php/javascript with some Ajax and open source stuff and the Oracle database underneath) has demonstrated that we can embed some of the essence of web 2.0 in actual business applications (we are looking at curriculum management as a collaborative process rather than a workflow).
The VLE world seems to have shot itself in the foot with high cost versus poor delivery and a non-competitative market place. Maybe time is ripe for a monster Google Moodle to take over the world of learning? I want the credit for the name if it happens!